A New Year, A New Perspective

I almost never make new years’ resolutions. I figure if I want to do something, just go ahead and do it when you see that it really needs doing.

But I do see the logic in it. The start of a new year is indeed a good time to take stock of where you are, much like the sage advise of changing your smoke detector batteries when you switch to/from daylight savings time. A time for everything, and January 1st is a good time to reflect on your goals and accomplishments, among other things.

Something I have been pondering the last few days is mediocrity. Like 99% of all people, I have to watch this one. I realize that if it weren’t for mediocrity, any of us would be well-known for whatever our passion in life is. Perhaps your passion is playing the banjo. Better still in my book is a passion for God, I would be amiss not to mention. But whatever it is, do you see how our mediocrity holds us back from learning it better? If we really desire something, we will always be thinking of it, fiddling with it, turning it over in our minds. And thereby we overcome all the obstacles we encounter and enjoy the progress we see happening.

Of course, we all can, and do, have several passions in our lives. Hopefully, your job is one of them, I suspect if you play a musical instrument or sing, then this is one of your passions. Your family, your spiritual life, keeping fit – remember in all these: keep mediocrity out and watch yourself prosper.

Posted in Philosophical Ramblings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sold: An Epiphone MB-200

I finally sold one of mine – a banjo, that is.

It was an Epiphone MB-200 I had bought used a few years ago. At the time, I thought it was just a small step above a beginning banjo, so I had paid a small price for it. But the more I played it, the more I realized this was a very good quality mid-range banjo. It’s been my second-most favorite banjo to play (next to my Stelling Red Fox) and I usually kept it in D-tuning, much of the time just right there on the couch and ready to play. It rarely got out of tune and was a bit soft in terms of volume. Quality of sound was good, not exceptional, and the playability was excellent.

I sold it to a fellow banjo player who really needed a better quality instrument, so I’m glad for that. But I do miss it, being the first one I ever sold. No, I don’t have that many banjos, but still, it’s hard to depart with temporal things like musical instruments sometimes. I tell myself perhaps I’ll use the money to get either a tenor banjo or a cello banjo one day soon.

On a larger scale than just the missing of an instrument you have gotten used to playing, I’ve noticed that musical instruments often go through a cycle of being played, stored, sold, played, stored, rediscovered, and so forth in various combinations. Eventually, they typically become very modified and then downright beat up to the point of being discarded. So sad.

Occasionally, a really valuable instrument finds its true value in life, many perilous years after having been built. Like pre-war Gibson banjos, or even pre-1960 Harmony Stella 12-string guitars. (No, mine is a 1960s, after they started being mass produced). These are valued as they should be, but still you have to wonder what the next owner will do with it; something wise or something not-so-wise?

Posted in Banjos in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Merry Christmas!

I’m perfectly glad to use the word CHRISTMAS; as our saviour, Jesus Christ is the central figure in Christmas, as well as in all of history.

 

So here’s wishing you all a Merry Christmas!

 

Now if we just had some snow down here…

Posted in Music in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Tribute to Jimmy Arnold

Unless you keep up with a lot of banjo players, you may not know Jimmy. After all, Jimmy Arnold is certainly not a household name. What did he ever do? The answer: in all my years of banjo playing, I’ve heard few people with as much raw talent for distinctive, stunning banjo breaks as Jimmy had.

Obviously there are other, more well-known banjo players: Earl Scruggs, Sonny Osborne, Bela Fleck, and Eric Weissberg of Dueling Banjos fame come to mind as being recognizable to the general public. To bluegrass aficionados, you should also add the names J. D. Crowe, Vic Jordan,  Bobby Thompson, Bill Emerson, Alan Munde, Bill Keith, … the list is extensive.

But in my book, few others have that touch, that absolute skill with creativity, that Jimmy possessed, even thought they may have gone much farther and higher on the whole.

To my knowledge, he put out only a few records and never achieved great success with his music. I have his banjo album, Strictly Arnold, on vinyl and it has always been a special musical set.

Sadly, Jimmy died much too soon after a tragedy-filled life. Alcohol and broken relationships were a recurring theme in his life.

Today, we approach the 17th anniversary since he died suddenly in 1992 of a heart attack. I’ve heard the exact day as either Christmas Day or New Years day. Not sure which is right.

I just know I miss this good ‘ol southern boy and his music, as does everyone who knew him personally and professionally.

Posted in Banjoists and Others | Tagged , | 10 Comments

A Taxonomy of Banjos

This is just a fun excursion into different types of banjos. Some of you know all of these variants already, but here they are for all to see: all the different types of banjos that I am aware of. I’ve also included a few notes of general interest and some styles usually played on each type of instrument.

5-String Bluegrass Banjo. The usual banjo that we think of in connection with such styles as:

  1. Scruggs
  2. Melodic
  3. Single-string
  4. 4-Finger

5-String Old-time Banjo. Also a very common banjo. This is similar to the bluegrass banjo above, but lacks a resonator on the back, and may be set up for better tone when not using picks. Styles include:

  1. Frailing, or clawhammer.
  2. 2-Finger

Mountain Banjo. A variant of the old-time banjo above, I include this as a separate instrument mainly due to the very different look (it has a rather wide wooden rim flush with the drumhead, a very small pot and is often fretless) and its even softer sound.

Folk Banjo. Similar to an open-backed Old-time banjo, but with three extra frets.This is the longest banjo you’ll see. Pete Seeger popularized this back in the 50s and 60s; it allowed him to more easily play songs in the key of E. You would just capo up to the third fret for songs in the key of G.

Tenor Banjo. Now we get into the other major variant encountered in banjos. The tenor lacks the 5th drone string of a 5-string. Like the 5-string, it has several different tunings for Dixieland Jazz and for Irish folk music (where it is tuned in 5ths like a mandolin or fiddle). At 19 frets (or sometimes, 17 frets), the tenor is also shorter.

Plectrum Banjo. Similar to a tenor, but with 4 more frets, making it as long as a 5-string, but without the 5th string. It is usually played CGBD, or else EADG (ie, like the top 4 strings of a guitar).

6-String Banjo. A more recent invention. The most common version of a 6-string banjo is the banjitar; it is uses the standard guitar tuning (EADGBE). Deering makes 12-string banjitar! I’ve also hear of a 6-string that is the usual 5-string open G (GDGBD), plus a lower bass string that also gives an open G. In this case, the 6th string is the drone, and the 5th string is the added bass string. I think you would tune that extra bass string to a B below the 4th string D, but you could also make it an octave below D.

Mandolin-Banjo. These were popular around the early 1900s. As with standard banjos, they were often played by women in that day. Like a standard mandolin, these have 4 courses, each course having 2 strings.

Ukulele-Banjo. Also popular in the early 1900s. Ukulele strings and tuning, with a banjo body.

Banjo-Dulcimer. I’ve seen a banjo dulcimer being made by McSpadden. Sounds pretty nice and quite unique.

Cello Banjo Goldtone recently started making these again. They used to be played around the early 1900s. Tuning is CGDA for the 4-string version, or GDGBD, one octave below standard open G tuning on a 5-string banjo.

Bass Banjos. These have been various versions of bass banjos down through the years. A nice one currently being made is by Brian Hefferan.

That’s it! Do you know of some other rare or oddball banjo? I’d love to hear about it!

Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

Posted in 2-Finger Style, 4-Finger Style, Banjos in General, Dulcimers, Mandolins | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Melodics and Soul

If you are a banjoist, you’re probably aware of the melodic style of 5-string banjo playing, whereby you are playing primarily melody notes, as opposed to fewer melody notes surrounded by ‘filler’ notes, as in Scruggs style. This style of banjo playing was invented in the 50s and 60s by Bobby Thompson and Bill Keith independently of each other.

Melodic style, or ‘chromatics’ as it was styled by some (a misnomer, though), is an electrifying playing style. When you first see a melodic scale played skillfully on the banjo up close, it really can be an eye opening experience. Its bold and brash presentation can contrast considerably with banjos at the other extreme, such as quiet mountain banjos as they are deftly frailed to tell a tale. No emotions in melodics, for the most part; this style is used for getting the point of technical skill across to the listeners.

But that’s not what it’s really all about.

True, the world does love the fast breaks and staccato notes of a great banjo break, in any style, for that matter. But ultimately, it’s more about musical expression of what’s inside us that about how technically skillful we can become.

Now don’t get me wrong – I love the technical, skillful, fast, bluesy, hot banjo breaks as much as anyone! I create a lot of them myself. And I can listen to them over and over. But I also see that that is just one very loved segment of the whole. You have to balance things, is what I’m saying.

Historically, melodic style has been solidly a technical style as opposed to a soulful style. Let me expand a little on those two categories of styles.

When I think of the blues, it’s not so much of brilliant solos, carefully crafted chords and complex rhythms as I do of meaning; or put another way, I think of the blues as a true musical expression of an honest cause.

Conversely, I think of melodic style as emphasizing technical prowess over conveyance of musical meaning. It certainly gets the job done of delivering the melody, but compared to the blues played on a old guitar – there’s just something missing when you step back and examine it as an end in and of itself.

I think I see what’s missing.

When I think of rock guitar, I think (among other things) of precise patterns and exacting melodies, much as I think of playing licks on a banjo, but it also has that blues influence in it. An electric guitar doesn’t have the filler notes of Scruggs style banjo, so it really is quite similar to melodic style banjo, just with more sustain when needed. So why not think of melodic style the same way we think of electric guitar runs and riffs; they can be precise melodies, but they can also emulate the blues. By introducing some blues techniques into melodic style we can add another dimension to our musical expression.

We can start by simply modifying out approach to creating melodic runs. It seems to make sense to just break them up a bit more, to add well-placed spaces into breaks more frequently than has been done in the past and to use dotted notes more. For more, just start listening to electric guitar solos and you’ll start to see both similarities and differences with respect to the banjo. These basic steps will help to set apart our melodic runs and can even help define our own styles in a better way.

Bottom line: yes, melodic style has certainly not been synonymous with soulful playing up until now, but there is nothing to stop us from adding more feeling to our melodic style playing.

Posted in Melodic Style, Philosophical Ramblings | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Protools for Dummies – a review

Yes, I love the Dummies series! (BTW, Bill Evans, who along with Sonny Osborne and Cindy Sinclair runs NashCamp, is the author of ‘Banjo for Dummies’; another excellent Dummies book). Just as with book editing software that I blogged on recently (I like Adobe inDesign for books, BTW), I have been tossing about for really good recording software, and ProTools seems to be the premiere package in this field.

Just as with Adobe inDesign, this software has a rather steep learning curve, but this book covers it well from the very beginning. If you’re advanced, then this book is probably not for you, but I know it will be a long time before I outgrow it myself. I especially appreciate the chapter on preparing your PC environment for installing ProTools; something I’ve not seen altogether in one place before. This book also set the stage for ProTools-specific learning by prepping you on a lot of basic recording details. I appreciated these, not having an extensive background in recording. I knew some of the details, such as different microphone types and their strong/weak points, but I didn’t mind. In going over such things, we are really filling in the blanks in our education.

So if you’re new to recording and want a good starting place to learn the premier recording package Protools, this is a great starting point.

Posted in Recording, Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Adobe InDesign CS4 – a review

What does this have to do with music, you ask? In and of itself, not a lot. However, I am writing a book or two on the banjo, and this has proven to be a significant choice – that of what Desktop Publishing (DTP) software to use when writing a book. After having started out on MS Word, I saw a definite need for more book-writing-specific software. I switched to MS Publisher; this was a bit more flexible, but still wasn’t quite the tool for the task. After looking at a few other options, I felt that Adobe inDesign hit the nail on the head so to speak. But as with anything that does everything, there is more of a learning curve to it. This book looks to be filling that need well.

I’m using the CS4 version; like most any Adobe product these days, it is well-integrated with other Adobe software, using the same look, location and functionality across the whole suite of products. Once you learn it, getting up on another Adobe application will be all the quicker. Now, if I just had more time!

If you’re thinking about writing anything, music or otherwise, do consider this as opposed to a more basic tool such as Word or Publisher. You’ll be glad to have this tool under your belt.

I’m currently reading Visual Quickstart Guide to InDesign CS4. It’s a good basic book to learn the ropes of this DTP package. Yes, this is a quick reference book whose methodical style essentially walks you through every single feature; some folks like this, others don’t. I find it good enough of a balance to get the basics done. Eventually, I’ll most likely wind up with one or two other titles, each with a different strength to balance each other. But this title will get the job done as an good initial introduction to inDesign CS4.

Posted in Music in General, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What to Listen for in Music – a review

What to Listen for in Music, by Aaron Copland. Aaron Copland was one of the first, and still one of the greatest, American composers of what we usually call classical music. For us bluegrass, old-time and folk musicians, it’s worth noting that what we call classical music actually refers to a certain period of music from about the mid 1700s to early 1800s. Generally speaking, we refer to all of this musical genre as classic music instead of classical music. So this book, which is the only book on music appreciation written by a great composer, is geared towards listening to classic music. As stated in the preface, listening to music is a skill that is acquired through experience and learning; that applies to whatever your musical niche might be.

Copland wrote the first edition of this book in 1939 and revised it in 1957 to include some of the significant changes that had appeared in classic music to that date. What to Listen for in Music exposes the various elements that go into making great music from the perspective of a significant composer and conductor. His explanations of musical metrics, terms and notions, often accompanied by examples and snippets, really make you want to go right out and buy a few CDs. In going over the chapters on such topics as rhythm, tone and harmony, I found it helpful to already know a fair bit of musical terminology and theory, as he does go at a fast pace; there is only so much space in a small book, so some topics must be condensed a bit. It would be best to read this book at least twice to get the most from it, especially if you are new to musical concepts and jargon.

I especially like the chapters on the Four Elements of Music (Rhythm, Melody, Harmony and Tone Color) and the two on Musical Texture and Musical Structure. These set the foundation for much of what we need to learn in most any musical endeavor, although, as mentioned above, it does go by rather quickly. I’ve learned a good bit of information that I’m not usually exposed to in Bluegrass, Folk and the like.

Posted in Music in General, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Heilmeier's Catechism

Here’s something I read in the Huntsville Times recently that I’d like to share with you. It starts with Lisa Porter, the director of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA – sounds a little like DARPA; the name of the project that became the Internet). She was in town to speak at UAH (nowadays called UAHuntsville) and she discussed a very interesting concept that I immediately saw as being perfectly applicable to musical projects (CDs, band efforts, new concepts and directions… you name it).

This concept is called the Heilmeier’s Catechism after its creator George Heilmeier. It’s a series of questions credited to Heilmeier that anyone proposing a research project, product development effort or banjo business plan (you know I put that one in, don’t you!) would do well to reflect upon, be able to thoroughly answer and review periodically. You can easily Google ‘Heilmeier’s Catechism’for more info, but it really needs little more in the way of explanation. It is deceptively simple, as Lisa Porter stated. Here are the questions that compose Heilmeier’s Catechism.

  • What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using absolutely no jargon.
  • How is it done today, and what are the limits of current practice?
  • What’s new in your approach and why do you think it will be successful?
  • Who cares?
  • If you’re successful, what difference will it make?
  • What are the risks and the payoffs?
  • How much will it cost?
  • How long will it take?
  • What are the midterm and final “exams” to check for success?

In addition to these, the Huntsville Times article also listed a few more, perhaps added by someone along the way; I’m not sure of their origin. Note also, these 4 really are a bit more business-oriented as witnessed by their more business-oriented jargon:

  • What is your program plan?
  • How will you measure progress?
  • What are your milestones/metrics?
  • What is you transition strategy?

Do you see how readily this can apply to whatever your pursuits (musical or otherwise) may be? Perhaps not every questions will be equally suitable to all your endeavors, but taken as a whole, they certainly help you define you efforts and keep them on track. Just think about one of the things you have in mind to do musically, and see if this doesn’t help you with getting things started and better defined!

Posted in Banjos & Technology, Music in General, Philosophical Ramblings | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment